Final Answer:
Evidence and results ensure the credibility and applicability of universal laws across diverse scenarios, establishing their validity.
So, D) Laws must have evidence and results to support the proof is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Universal laws are fundamental principles that govern natural phenomena or human behavior. The necessity for evidence and results to support a law's validity is crucial. Evidence forms the backbone of any law, ensuring its credibility and applicability across diverse scenarios.
For instance, in scientific laws, empirical data and experimentation validate hypotheses, supporting the universality of the law. This requirement of evidence and results ensures that laws are not merely conjectures but have undergone rigorous testing, enhancing their reliability and acceptance.
Observations alone might provide initial insights, but they can be subjective and prone to bias. The inclusion of evidence and results safeguards against errors in interpretation or individual biases, ensuring the objectivity and accuracy of the law.
Additionally, clear hypotheses in laws are vital for establishing a framework for testing and verification. Laws without a clear hypothesis lack the necessary structure for scrutiny and may falter in their universality and applicability. Thus, while consensus among people is valuable, it's insufficient to determine a law's validity without substantive evidence and results.
In essence, laws must surpass mere agreement or observational basis. They must stand the test of empirical evidence and results to claim universality.
This demand for substantiated proof establishes the credibility and reliability of universal laws, ensuring their widespread acceptance and applicability across various domains.
So, D) Laws must have evidence and results to support the proof is correct.