Final answer:
The least likely consequence of lying to obtain a mineral lease is criminal prosecution, as civil remedies are generally pursued, such as voiding the lease or losing professional certification.
Step-by-step explanation:
When lying to a mineral lease holder to obtain a lease, the least likely consequence would be c. You may be prosecuted criminally and face potential jail time. Crimes involving deceit and misrepresentation can result in criminal charges, but in the context of a lease agreement, it's more likely that the focus would be on civil remedies, not criminal prosecution, unless the deceit was part of a larger scheme or fraud. a. You would lose the lease agreement and b. The lease agreement may be accepted but later determined voidable are both direct consequences of presenting false information in a contract. These contract-related issues are regularly managed under civil law, with remedies such as cancelling the lease or seeking damages. d. You may lose certification or membership in the AAPL (American Association of Professional Landmen) could also occur if the individual is a member and they have breached the ethical standards expected by the association.