Final answer:
The argument is valid as the conclusion follows logically from the premises provided. If the student gets good marks, they graduate, making the condition for going to Canada (not graduating) not applicable, thus the student would not go to Canada.
Step-by-step explanation:
The validity of the argument presented can be assessed using logical statements and deductive reasoning. We will break down the argument into premises and conclusion to analyze its structure:
- Premise 1: Either I will get good marks or I will not graduate. (This is a logical disjunction)
- Premise 2: If I did not graduate, I will go to Canada. (This is a logical conditional)
- Premise 3: I get good marks. (This is a statement of fact within the context of the argument)
- Conclusion: Thus, I would not go to Canada. (This is the conclusion drawn from the premises)
Now, let's proceed with the logical deduction:
- From Premise 3, we know that I get good marks.
- Given the disjunctive nature of Premise 1, if one part is true (getting good marks), the other part (not graduating) is false.
- Since I get good marks (Premise 3), I did graduate, which means the conditional statement in Premise 2 ('If I did not graduate, I will go to Canada') doesn't apply.
- Therefore, the conclusion that I would not go to Canada logically follows from the premises.
The argument is valid because the conclusion follows logically from the premises.