Final answer:
The calculation of Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) shows Techron II as the more cost-effective option with an EAC of $14,500 compared to Techron I's EAC of $50,250.
Step-by-step explanation:
To evaluate the two different silicon wafer milling machines, we need to calculate the Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) for both machines. The EAC allows us to compare the cost-effectiveness of each machine by spreading out the costs over their respective lifespans.
Calculation for Techron I:
Initial cost: $270,000
Salvage value: $45,000
Depreciation: ($270,000 - $45,000) / 3 years = $75,000 per year
Operating costs: $69,000 per year
Depreciation tax shield: $75,000 * 35% = $26,250 per year
Total annual cost: Operating costs - tax shield = $69,000 - $26,250 = $42,750
EAC = Total annual cost + (Depreciation * discount rate)
EAC = $42,750 + ($75,000 * 10%) = $42,750 + $7,500 = $50,250
Calculation for Techron II:
Initial cost: $475,000
Salvage value: $45,000
Depreciation: ($475,000 - $45,000) / 5 years = $86,000 per year
Operating costs: $36,000 per year
Depreciation tax shield: $86,000 * 35% = $30,100 per year
Total annual cost: Operating costs - tax shield = $36,000 - $30,100 = $5,900
EAC = Total annual cost + (Depreciation * discount rate)
EAC = $5,900 + ($86,000 * 10%) = $5,900 + $8,600 = $14,500
Considering the calculations, Techron II has a lower EAC and hence is the more cost-effective choice over its lifespan.