Final Answer:
a. If the euro weakens as predicted by Manny (Case 1: $1.1693/E), Chronos benefits from hedging at 120%, gaining $15,196.89. If Manny is wrong (Case 2: $1.2527/E), Chronos would have been better off without hedging, losing $14,166.15.
b. Hedging 120% of a transaction exposure means securing more than the full value of the exposure against potential exchange rate fluctuations, providing a surplus protection in case of adverse movements.
c. The most conservative transaction exposure management policy involves hedging beyond the actual exposure, ensuring a surplus protection against adverse currency movements. Chronos follows a conservative approach, hedging at least 70% and allowing flexibility to increase it to 120% when anticipating devaluation or depreciation.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. In Case 1, if the euro weakens as predicted by Manny to $1.1693/E, Chronos' 120% hedge would result in a gain. Calculating the gain by subtracting the forward rate ($1.22886) from the predicted rate ($1.1693) and multiplying it by the invoice amount (€1,550,000), the gain is $15,196.89. However, in Case 2, if Manny's prediction is wrong and the euro strengthens to $1.2527/E, Chronos would have been better off without hedging, incurring a loss of $14,166.15.
b. Hedging 120% of a transaction exposure implies protecting more than the total exposure. It provides an additional safeguard against adverse movements, ensuring a surplus protection beyond the actual value of the transaction.
c. The most conservative transaction exposure management policy involves over-hedging to mitigate risks further. Chronos' policy aligns with conservative practices by hedging at least 70% and allowing an increase up to 120% when anticipating devaluation or depreciation, demonstrating a proactive approach to risk management. This strategy ensures a significant level of protection against currency fluctuations, reflecting a prudent and conservative financial stance.