Final answer:
The contradiction between the Buddhist perspective and the Hindu view from the Hymn of the Primeval Man lies in Buddhism's rejection of an eternal soul (Atman) and its challenging of the caste system, advocating enlightenment for all, while Hinduism supports the idea of an eternal soul merging with a universal reality (Brahman) and tends to uphold social stratification.
Step-by-step explanation:
The quote from the Buddha that may contradict the point of view expressed in the Hymn of the Primeval Man is primarily centered around the rejection of the concept of an eternal, unchanging soul or self, which is fundamental to Hinduism. In Hinduism, especially as expressed in the Hymn of the Primeval Man, there's an underlying belief in Brahman as the ultimate reality and Atman as the individual self, which is seen as a permanent, eternal essence that eventually merges with Brahman. This is where the concept of an eternal soul in Hinduism is established. On the other hand, the Buddha introduced the doctrine of anatman, which denies the permanent self. Instead, Buddha's teaching of dependent origination posits a continuous process of change and causation, where nothing exists independently, and everything is interconnected. This teaching directly challenges the Hindu view, promoting the concept that there is no permanent self that carries on or merges with a greater universal reality. Additionally, Buddha criticized the rigid caste system upheld by the Brahmanical tradition, which is often derived from texts like the Hymn of the Primeval Man. Buddhism preaches the potential for enlightenment for all beings, regardless of caste, which stands in contrast to the social stratification supported by traditional Hinduism.