Final answer:
To advise TK Travel (Pty) Ltd on whether to buy or lease a tanker, one must consider the total costs over five years, including initial costs, annual payments, depreciation, maintenance, salvage value, and tax effects, and compare the net present value of owning versus leasing.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost Analysis: Buy vs. Lease Tanker
To determine whether TK Travel (Pty) Ltd should purchase or lease a tanker, one must compare the cost of owning and the cost of leasing, taking into account initial outlays, ongoing expenses, depreciation, salvage value, and tax implications. The purchase option has an upfront cost of R400,000. Annual service and maintenance costs for ownership are R15,000. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over five years, resulting in an annual depreciation expense of (R400,000 - R40,000) / 5 years = R72,000. The salvage value is expected to be R40,000 at the end of the period. Tax savings from depreciation and service charges should be considered. When leasing, a down payment of R100,000 is made, followed by annual payments of R100,000. The lessor covers service charges. The cost of ownership and leasing will be further adjusted by the after-tax cost of debt, which stands at 10%.
It is crucial to note that the total costs should be compared on an after-tax basis to reflect the true economic cost to the company. The decision will depend on the net present value of each option, taking the after-tax cost of capital as the discount rate.
The lease option may offer advantages, such as lower initial and annual cash outflows and absence of maintenance costs, which could make it financially more attractive for the company. However, the ownership option might be cost-effective in the long run, especially when considering the salvage value, despite higher annual depreciation and maintenance costs.
Leasing a vehicle, as a more general observation, usually requires a smaller down payment and has lower monthly payments compared to outright purchases, making it initially appear more affordable. But in long-term scenarios, owning the asset might prove to be more economical despite higher upfront costs, particularly as leasing may come with extra charges for surpassing mileage limits, and the company does not retain asset ownership at the end of the lease term.