Final answer:
Blank Co.'s accounting for a 25% investment in Overload Inc. differs if the investment is classified as available-for-sale or reflects significant influence. Available-for-sale investments adjust to fair value, while significant influence invokes equity method accounting. Both methods impact the investment carrying amount and total net income reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's query is about the accounting treatment for a 25% investment in another company's common stock by Blank Co. and revolves around the classification of the investment as available-for-sale or exercising significant influence over the investee, which would be treated as an equity method investment. The answer would include journal entries under both scenarios and the impact on the balance sheet and total net income. When an investment is classified as available-for-sale, Blank Co. would record dividend income and adjust the investment to its fair value at the end of the year, with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income (OCI). If the investment allows Blank Co. to exercise significant influence, it would use the equity method, under which it would recognize its share of Overload's net income and dividends as changes in the investment's carrying amount. The investment's carrying amount on the balance sheet and the total net income reported for the year would differ under each method. The available-for-sale method would show the investment at its fair value, while the equity method would show it at the original cost adjusted for Blank Co.'s share of Overload's net income and dividends received.