Final answer:
A user-defined class named Grade would compile individual student grades based on marks, with methods to cater to both capitalist and communist grading ideologies, emphasizing the importance of grading systems in reflecting individual efforts or collective success.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of grading students can be paralleled to various systems including capitalist and communist ideologies. In a capitalist grading system, success is often based on factors such as attendance, ability, and work ethic. Under this system, students compete against one another, with grades reflecting their individual efforts and achievements.
Conversely, a communist model of grading emphasizes collective success. In such a scenario, if a teacher adopts a grading system where all students receive a 'C' because the class average is 75%, this neglects individual performance and operates on the principle that 'we're only as strong as our weakest link'.
A user-defined class named Grade would need to account for these variations. It could theoretically compile a subject grade based on marks obtained throughout the term. Beyond just reporting numbers, this class could categorize final grades according to a bell curve distribution, as is commonly done (A, B, C, D, or F) or via any other grading model the institution follows.
When considering how to adjust for individual versus collective grading models, the Grade class might include methods for both, depending on the educational philosophy it aims to support. The class would need to be flexible enough to accommodate the variations in grading systems, from traditional to more progressive approaches.