Final answer:
Marge Atkins should consider the practice of budgetary slack displayed by Scott Ford and Pete Granger as unethical due to its long-term negative impact on decision-making, resource allocation, and trust within the company. Inflating costs or reducing sales forecasts in budgets can lead to serious consequences, and Marge should foster an ethical culture with accurate financial reporting.
Step-by-step explanation:
Marge Atkins, as a management accountant at Norton Company, should consider the ethical implications of the behavior described by Scott Ford and Pete Granger. According to ethical and professional accounting standards, budgets should reflect realistic and honest projections, not inflated figures that can mislead stakeholders and management. A practice known as budgetary slack, which involves deliberately understating sales or overstating costs, may provide short-term benefits such as meeting targets or having a cushion but can lead to poor decision-making, resource misallocation, and damage to the integrity of financial reporting in the long term.
Creating a budget with intentionally lowered sales estimates or increased cost projections can also have long-term consequences, including undermining trust within the organization, negatively impacting morale if the true potential is consistently underrepresented, and potentially affecting the company's strategic planning and investment decisions based on these inaccurate figures.
Therefore, Marge Atkins should address this issue with the appropriate level of concern, promoting an ethical culture that advocates for accurate and responsible financial reporting. She should encourage open and honest discussions around budget forecasts and stress the importance of integrity in the budgeting process to Scott Ford, Pete Granger, and other managerial staff.