Final answer:
To address the question about the fairness of the remedy in Turcott vs. Estate of Clarence D. Bates, specific details about the case are required, which are not provided, rendering an accurate legal opinion impossible in this context.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question "Do you believe that Deann received a fair and equitable remedy in the case Turcott vs. Estate of Clarence D. Bates?" requires analysis from a legal standpoint. To confidently answer this, we would need specific details about Turcott vs. Estate of Clarence D. Bates, which are not provided. For an accurate legal evaluation, knowledge of the claims, defenses, procedural history, controlling law, and the court's application of the law to the facts are essential. Without these, making a judgment on the fairness or equity of the remedy Deann received would be speculative and professionally irresponsible.
Furthermore, given that the provided references do not pertain to the Turcott vs. Estate of Clarence D. Bates case, but rather to historical legal cases like Dred Scott v. Sandford and the significance of jury trials, it would be inappropriate to utilize them to draw conclusions about a case for which they bear no relevancy.