Final answer:
The comparison between investing in the mutual fund 'MF' and the Capital Market Line involves calculating the appropriate weights for a CML portfolio with equivalent volatility to 'MF', determining its expected return, and evaluating the impact of incorporating an emerging market ETF into 'MF's strategy.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question revolves around determining if investing in the mutual fund 'MF' is more advantageous than investing on the Capital Market Line (CML). To answer this, a comparison is needed between the performance of 'MF' and a comparable portfolio on the CML which we calculate by finding the correct weights (y and 1-y).
Firstly, we need to find the portfolio on the CML that has the same volatility as 'MF', which is 24%. The equation for the CML is E(R) = risk-free rate + (portfolio volatility / market volatility) * market risk premium. We can find y by equating the volatility of 'MF' to that of an equal-volatility portfolio on the CML, using the market volatility of 20%.
After calculating y, the expected return of the CML portfolio can be found using the same CML equation. To assess the impact of a change in 'MF's investment strategy, we consider the introduction of an emerging market ETF to the portfolio and calculate the new volatility after selling 20% of 'MF's assets to buy the ETF. The new volatility must account for the correlation of 0.1 between MF’s assets and the emerging market ETF, along with their respective standard deviations.