Final answer:
The intentional misstatement of including July cash receipts in June's figures might be motivated by a desire to inflate the year-end cash balance, while cut-off testing is an audit procedure used to detect such fraud.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of this question is the business topic of auditing and understanding financial statements, specifically in regards to the cash balance on a client's balance sheet and the valuation of loans in a secondary market. The misstatement example suggests fraud and requires the use of audit procedures to uncover such discrepancies.
a. If cash receipts from July were intentionally recorded as June receipts, the likely motivation for this fraud would be to inflate the year-end cash balance, possibly to meet financial targets, improve the appearance of cash flows before an audit, or influence financial ratios that may be tied to management bonuses or loan covenants.
c. An effective audit procedure to detect this type of misstatement involves cut-off testing. This involves reviewing the timing of transactions around the year-end to ensure they've been recorded in the correct period. This could include examining bank statements, reconciliations, and verifying dates of receipt or shipment of goods.