Final answer:
Mimi's recapitalization and gifting of shares to her children have reduced the cash needs of her estate by reducing its size but may increase future cash needs if her estate owes transfer taxes due to the use of her credit amount for gift tax.
Step-by-step explanation:
The effect of Mimi's preferred stock recapitalization and the gift of nonvoting common shares to her children on the liquidity of her estate can be complex. Considering the statements, we can assess the following:
- Statement I is correct: Mimi has reduced the cash needs of her estate because she has transferred assets out of her estate, thereby reducing its size.
- Statement II is incorrect: There is no information in the scenario that suggests a market for the shares has been established. Nor does transferring nonvoting shares typically enhance marketability, particularly if they remain closely held.
- Statement III is incorrect: The business remains an asset of Mimi's because she retained ownership of the preferred shares, which have significant value due to the fixed income and liquidation rights.
- Statement IV is correct: Mimi has potentially used some of her applicable credit amounts toward the gift tax, which could increase future cash needs if her estate exceeds the threshold for estate taxes.
Therefore, the correct answer would be C) I and IV - She has reduced the cash needs of her estate by decreasing its size, and potentially increased the cash needs if her estate would owe transfer taxes due to the use of her applicable credit amount for the gift tax.