Final answer:
It's impossible to accurately infer Mr. Lords' intentions without the content of paragraph 8. Option C suggests advocacy for parliamentary independence while Option D implies support for a Catholic absolute monarchy. To infer his intentions, one must review the specific context given in paragraph 8 of the source material.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the options provided and the reference to Parliament and the monarchy, it can be inferred that the question pertains to historical themes, possibly the English Civil War or the period of English constitutional development. Without paragraph 8, it is impossible to make an accurate inference about Mr. Lords' intentions. Nevertheless, the context provided by the two options suggests contrasting intentions: Option C indicates that he would advocate for Parliament's independence, suggesting a desire for a constitutional government, whereas Option D implies that he would support a Catholic absolute monarchy, suggesting a preference for centralized, religiously-based autocratic rule. Since Mr. Lords' specific intentions cannot be determined without the actual content of paragraph 8, it is essential to review the text in question to make a well-informed inference.