Final answer:
Daylight saving time is criticized for not actually saving daylight, just shifting time perception. The difficulty in ending daylight saving time is due to legislative complexities and synchronization challenges. Standard time and time zones adjustments also correct discrepancies with natural sundial time.
Step-by-step explanation:
One argument against the use of daylight saving time is that it doesn't actually "save" daylight, as it simply shifts the perception of time rather than adding more sunlight to the day. The text states 'It does not, of course, "save" any daylight at all-because the amount of sunlight is not determined by what we do with our clocks.' This highlights the fact that adjusting clocks does not influence the natural amount of daylight available, which is a common misconception about the purpose of daylight saving time.
Proposals to end daylight saving time have struggled in many states partially due to the complexity of regional and national synchronization. Legislative debate has occurred in some states, suggesting that changing the system is not straightforward and involves consideration of various factors, including synchronizing with neighboring states and jurisdictions that observe daylight saving time.
The text also describes how standard time and time zones are adjusted to correct for differences between sundial time and clock time. It points out that sundial time only matches clock time at a specific geographical longitude within each time zone, illustrating the adjustment necessary to maintain uniform time.