Final answer:
The consequences of imperialism on the Congo were viewed differently by the colonizers and the colonized. Europeans saw it as a means to exploit resources, while Africans experienced exploitation and negative impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The consequences of imperialism on the Congo were viewed differently by the colonizers (Europeans) and the colonized (Africans). The Europeans saw their colonization of the Congo as a means to exploit the region's resources, such as rubber and ivory, resulting in brutal treatment and exploitation of the local population. They expropriated land, imposed borders that divided existing kingdoms and tribes, and favored certain ethnic groups over others to maintain control.
On the other hand, the colonized Africans experienced the negative impacts of imperialism. They were forced into labor, often facing harsh punishment if they failed to meet quotas. Their traditional rights were taken away, and they suffered from the introduction of diseases brought by the colonizers. Additionally, the arbitrary borders and ethnic divisions created by the Europeans continue to contribute to violent ethnic conflicts in Africa today.