Final answer:
Herman Cortez’s conquest of the Aztecs and Francisco Pizarro’s conquest of the Inca Empire had both similarities and differences. Both conquistadors were Spanish and took advantage of political instability, but Cortez conquered the Aztecs in Mexico while Pizarro conquered the Incas in South America.
Step-by-step explanation:
Herman Cortez’s conquest of the Aztecs and Francisco Pizarro’s conquest of the Inca Empire had both similarities and differences. One similarity is that both Cortez and Pizarro were Spanish conquistadors who led expeditions to the Americas in search of wealth. Both conquistadors also took advantage of political instability within the Aztec and Inca empires to achieve their conquests. However, there were also differences between the two conquests. Cortez conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico, while Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America. The Aztecs initially welcomed Cortez, believing him to be a god, while the Inca emperor Atahualpa was hostile towards Pizarro. Additionally, the Aztecs had a larger and more centralized empire compared to the Inca Empire, which made their conquest more challenging for Cortez.