Final answer:
The second lawyer's specific issue with the part of the deed is not detailed in the provided text, and there is no indication that they mentioned being robbed or swindled, so we are unable to provide a specific answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The second lawyer was concerned with a part of a deed, but the information provided does not explicitly state the reason given for the issue with the deed. From the context provided, it does not appear that the lawyer said that they were being robbed or swindled, but there are passages suggesting themes of theft, injustice, and the tension between legal frameworks and moral considerations in various situations. Without additional text specific to the second lawyer's claim, we can only speculate on the precise nature of their objection.