Question

What was a major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution?

A) The Articles provided for a defense of the states by the states, whereas the Constitution provided for a national military.
B) The Articles provided a strong central government while the Constitution created a weak confederate government.
C) Amending the Articles required all of the states’ approval while amending the Constitution required approval from only nine states.
D) Amending the Articles required three-fourths of the states’ approval while amending the Constitution required 100% approval.

Answer 1

A major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was the amending process. The Articles required unanimous approval from all states, while the Constitution only needed approval from nine states. Additionally, the Constitution strengthened the central government and provided for a national military.

Step-by-step explanation:

A major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was that amending the Articles required all of the states' approval, while amending the Constitution required approval from only nine states. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was weak relative to the states, while the Constitution created a stronger central government. The Constitution also provided for a national military, whereas the Articles relied on state defense.