Final answer:
Dmitri Williams's argument in the Los Angeles Times op-ed is developed through ethos, analogy, and cause and effect to establish credibility, create understanding, and exhibit potential outcomes, wrapping up with a strong emotional appeal for community in VR.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Dmitri Williams's Los Angeles Times op-ed 'Community is the 'Killer App' Missing from Virtual Reality', Williams artfully constructs his argument using a series of rhetorical strategies. Initially, Williams employs ethos by establishing his credibility in the subject matter through presenting his experience and expertise. This move helps to create a trustful bond with readers, positioning him as a reliable source.
Moreover, Williams integrates analogy to draw parallels between existing social networks and the potential of virtual reality (VR) platforms, giving the audience a familiar grounding to comprehend the untapped social aspect of VR. Furthermore, the author applies cause and effect to logically illustrate the potential outcomes of integrating community into VR, aiming to persuade by reasoning. He emphasizes how an active community could greatly enhance user engagement and retention, essentially arguing for VR's ability to transcend mere novelty. Finally, Williams wraps up his op-ed with an emotional appeal – pathos – as he speaks to the universal human desire to connect, tapping into the reader's emotions to reinforce his viewpoint.