Final answer:
In college, students are required to present clear position arguments supported by strong evidence and reasoning. I find arguments most convincing when they are backed by data, logical justifications, and address counterclaims empathetically. My stance is influenced by the quality of evidence presented and personal or external conditioning factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
In college-level position arguments, it is critical to articulate a clear stance on an issue and to defend it using substantial reasoning and evidence. When determining which side of an argument is easier to defend, it often depends on the individual's personal beliefs, experiences, and the evidence available. Arguments that I personally find compelling are those supported by robust data, logical reasoning, and address counterclaims with empathy and understanding.
For example, if discussing the removal of a controversial statute, I would present my viewpoint, substantiate it with cause-and-effect reasoning, and offer evidence like historical context and current community sentiment. It's also important to address opposition arguments by providing counterpoints that offer a respectful understanding of differing opinions but ultimately reinforce the original position. Empathy and factual consideration of all perspectives form the basis of persuasive argumentation.
Whether I am for or against a proposition depends on the specific topic at hand. Nevertheless, my position is generally aligned with which side presents the best evidence and reasoning in support of its arguments. In cases where my own convictions stem from personal values or empirical evidence, I must also evaluate whether I've been influenced by external conditioning, which may include my education, societal standards, or cultural background.