Final answer:
The growth of agriculture, represented by the production of food, had a direct correlation with the development of large cities. Agricultural efficiency led to a surplus that allowed people to work in other professions, contributing to the economy and urbanization. This dynamic supported the growth of cities that relied on rural areas to supply their food, showing that agriculture and urbanization are closely linked.
Step-by-step explanation:
The growth of agriculture, specifically the need for food, was in direct correlation with the growth of large cities. As agriculture developed and became more efficient, it led to a surplus of food production, making it possible for not everyone to work in agriculture. This surplus enabled populations to grow, and with more people came the need for more specialized jobs and services.
Thus, as farming became more efficient, fewer people were needed to produce food, which allowed others to pursue different professions and trades, contributing to the development of economies and urbanization. People could build buildings, create pottery, engage in trade, and even develop early forms of writing. The advent of agriculture and the subsequent ability to feed a growing population led directly to the rise of urban centers, where a variety of new occupations beyond agriculture could flourish.
As cities grew, the demand for food continued to increase, and agriculture had to keep pace. This dynamic relationship between agriculture and urban growth was fundamental to the development of organized communities, which often evolved into political entities or empires. The growth of cities depended on the successful production and distribution of food from rural areas to the urban populace, only affirming the strong correlation between agricultural growth and urbanization.