Final answer:
The correct answer is option (a). The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in response to the Boston Tea Party. The Royal governor banning town hall meetings was not one of the results of the Intolerable Acts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Intolerable Acts, also known as the Coercive Acts, were a series of punitive measures imposed by the British government on the American colonies in response to their resistance and protest against unjust policies.
One of the key outcomes of the Intolerable Acts was the closure of the port of Boston, making it illegal to harbor ships in the harbor until the East India Company was compensated for the tea destroyed during the Boston Tea Party.
This measure severely impacted the economic livelihood of the people in Boston and heightened tensions between the colonies and Britain.Additionally, the Acts aimed to assert more control over colonial governance.
The option C you provided, stating that British officials would stand trial in Britain instead of Boston, accurately represents one of the Acts' provisions.
This provision not only undermined local judicial autonomy but also created a situation where British officials could potentially evade accountability for their actions in the colonies.The choice D, stating that royal governors could ban town hall meetings, is another accurate outcome of the Intolerable Acts.
This restriction on town hall meetings curtailed the colonists' ability to assemble and discuss their grievances, further suppressing their political voice.
LIn summary, while the higher tax on tea (option A) was not a direct result of the Intolerable Acts, the closure of the port of Boston, the change in trial jurisdiction, and the restriction on town hall meetings were significant consequences that fueled colonial discontent and contributed to the escalation of tensions leading up to the American Revolutionary War.