158k views
4 votes
Which of the following explains the difference between the original rules for Georgia and the rules for the Royal Colony?

OA The original colony of Georgia focused on becoming allies of the natives, but the Royal Colony made rules against working with the Creeks.
OB The Charter of 1732 did not allow slavery, but the King of England accepted the practice in 1750 so that the economy of Georgia could prosper.
OC The colony of Georgia originally accepted those who could protect it from its enemies, but during the Royal Colony, those who were trained in warfare were not allowed to be colonists.
OD The Charter of 1732 allowed colonists free land and additionally allowed them to purchase enough land to create plantations much like those in South Carolina, but during the Royal Colony, large land purchases were not allowed.​

User Banica
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The original rules for Georgia focused on becoming allies with the natives, while the rules for the Royal Colony included making rules against working with the Creeks and allowing slavery. These changes were a result of the transition from a Trustee colony to a Royal colony.

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference between the original rules for Georgia and the rules for the Royal Colony can be explained by the transition from a Trustee colony to a Royal colony. One key difference is that the original colony of Georgia focused on becoming allies of the natives, while the Royal Colony made rules against working with the Creeks. Another difference is that the Charter of 1732 did not allow slavery, but the King of England accepted the practice in 1750 to help the economy of Georgia prosper. These changes in rules and policies were a result of the transition from a Trustee colony to a Royal colony.

User Ohmen
by
7.3k points