Final answer:
The author would likely say that judging others who have survived a life-threatening event is unfair and unjust. They emphasize the importance of how people treat others and are treated by them in determining the worth of their lives.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author staunchly advocates against the unfair judgment of individuals who have survived life-threatening events, emphasizing the inherent injustice in such assessments. The crux of their perspective lies in the belief that one's worth is not solely determined by the challenges they face or the traumas they endure.
Instead, the author underscores the paramount significance of how people treat others and, reciprocally, how they are treated. This nuanced stance reveals a commitment to recognizing the intrinsic value of every individual, irrespective of their past struggles. The author's call for empathy and unbiased evaluation serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities inherent in gauging the worth of human lives.