Final answer:
Comparing Bradstreet and Johnson requires historical context, while Native American perceptions of European settlers were complex, shaped by trade, cultural exchanges, and conflicts. Contemporary issues such as tariffs and trade wars impede international relations. Native American cultures varied widely but often shared a spiritual connection to the land.
Step-by-step explanation:
To compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson, we must delve into their respective historical contexts and writings. Bradstreet, a Puritan poet of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, is known for her reflective and deeply personal poems about her life and experiences, which may include interactions with Native Americans. Johnson, on the other hand, could refer to a variety of historical figures, and without additional context, it's challenging to pinpoint the exact comparison. For a more precise analysis, we need accurate identification of these individuals.
The perceptions of Native Americans regarding their relationships with European settlers varied widely, but generally, Native peoples saw Europeans as both potential allies and threats. Their perspectives were shaped by the diverse and complex interactions, which often included trade relationships, cultural exchanges, and conflicts.
When discussing contemporary barriers to foreign trade and political relations, issues such as tariffs, trade wars, political instability, and cultural differences are highly pertinent. These can significantly impede the smooth transaction of goods and diplomacy between nations.
In order to understand the lifestyles, religious practices, and customs among Native American peoples, one must acknowledge the vast diversity among different tribes and nations, with unique traditions and belief systems. Despite this variety, some commonalities often included a deep spiritual connection to the land and communal living.