Question

X is a human if and only if x is warm-blooded. Provide at least one specific, actual counterexample to this definition:

Specific, Actual Counterexample(s):
Two General Types of Counterexamples...
1) that would show the definition is unnecessarily specific:
2) that would show the definition is insufficiently broad:
Based on your counterexample(s), the definition is:
(unnecessarily specific, insufficiently broad, or both)

Answer 1

A specific counterexample to the definition is bats, which are warm-blooded mammals that are not humans. Another counterexample is the platypus, which is a mammal but not warm-blooded. Thus, the definition is both unnecessarily specific and insufficiently broad.

Step-by-step explanation:

Counterexample to the Definition

The definition states that a human is warm-blooded. However, there is a specific, actual counterexample to this definition. Bats are warm-blooded mammals but are not humans. This example shows that the definition is unnecessarily specific because it excludes other warm-blooded animals like bats.

Another counterexample that shows the definition is insufficiently broad is the platypus. The platypus is a mammal but is not warm-blooded. Therefore, it does not meet the condition of being a human according to the definition. This example demonstrates that the definition does not encompass all possible cases.

Counterexample Conclusion:

The definition is both unnecessarily specific and insufficiently broad.