Question

Melissa is an attorney with a criminal law practice. she has a big case in which her client was convicted of violating the state’s recently enacted medical marijuana law, and she is appealing his conviction to the state supreme court. tom, her husband, is a paralegal who works for the state attorney’s office and has been assigned to gather research opposing the brief that melissa filed on behalf of her client.

1) True
2) False

Answer 1

Differing marijuana laws across states and between state and federal governments create legal disparities in court treatment; harmonization of laws or federal non-interference in state marijuana policies may help address these issues.

Step-by-step explanation:

The differences in marijuana laws between states, as well as between federal and state law, can significantly affect how a person is treated in court. In some states, medical marijuana is legal and may be prescribed by a doctor for various health conditions, whereas federally, marijuana remains illegal under the Controlled Substances Act. This discrepancy can lead to a patchwork of enforcement where individuals may face different legal consequences for the same action depending on their location. To address these disparities, some suggest the federal government could reschedule marijuana to recognize its medicinal value, align federal policy with the majority of state policies, or leave it to states to regulate as they see fit without federal interference.