Final Answer:
John Jenkins justifies the decision to cover the murals of Christopher Columbus by arguing that they don't accurately portray all of the things Columbus did. Thus, the correct option is c) He argues that the murals don't accurately portray all of the things Columbus did.
Step-by-step explanation:
This implies that Jenkins believes the murals present a biased or incomplete view of Columbus's actions or contributions. By covering the murals, Jenkins aims to address this perceived misrepresentation and promote a more nuanced understanding of Columbus and his historical impact.
In his reasoning, Jenkins may emphasize the importance of historical accuracy and the need to present a comprehensive view of historical figures, acknowledging both their positive and negative aspects. This perspective aligns with a broader societal shift towards reevaluating historical narratives and ensuring a more inclusive and truthful representation of historical events and figures. By covering the murals, Jenkins may be signaling a commitment to fostering a more informed and balanced perspective on Columbus within the educational or public space.
Overall, Jenkins' justification underscores the ongoing dialogue about how history is depicted and the responsibility to present a more accurate portrayal of historical figures, even if it means covering existing artworks that may contribute to a one-sided narrative. This decision reflects a broader awareness of the impact of historical representations on public perception and the importance of critically examining and reassessing historical narratives.
Therefore, the correct option is c) He argues that the murals don't accurately portray all of the things Columbus did.