Final answer:
The statement regarding the aftermath of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring publication and its connection to a Supreme Court ruling refers to labor rights and pesticide control.
Step-by-step explanation:
After biologist Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, the United States Supreme Court decision that refers to migrant workers boycotting grape growers is concerned with labor rights and pesticide control. This statement encapsulates the broader impacts of Carson's work, which targeted the overuse and dangers of pesticides like DDT in agricultural practices. Silent Spring contributed to environmental conservation efforts and sparked awareness and actions on ecological issues, including the labor conditions and health risks farm workers faced due to pesticide exposure.
The book emphasized the adage that 'a thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community.' This idea, in concert with the growing social consciousness toward conservation and sustainability, drove political action like the ban of DDT in 1972 and influenced movements such as those led by Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers to improve conditions for migrant laborers.
Thus, the correct response to the statement regarding the aftermath of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring and its impact on a Supreme Court ruling favoring migrant workers who boycotted grape growers is (c) Labor rights and pesticide control.