Final answer:
The arguments between Walter and Ruth in 'A Raisin in the Sun' are complex, involving personal aspirations, societal challenges, and practical concerns within a racially divided society. These issues reflect the larger societal backdrop and internal family dynamics, contributing to the play's conflict and character development.
Step-by-step explanation:
In A Raisin in the Sun, the arguments between Walter and Ruth often stem from deeper issues than what is immediately apparent. The complexities of these arguments are reflective of issues inherent in the family's situation and the society they navigate. For instance, the arguments between Walter and Ruth not only represent personal frustrations and dreams within their marriage but also the bigger societal challenges, such as racial tensions, financial strife, and gender roles which were particularly pertinent during the era the play was set in. Walter's struggle with his role as a provider and his aspirations for a better life often clashes with Ruth's practical concerns and weary pragmatism.
These conflicts are part of the larger themes of the play, which portrays the difficulties faced by a black family in achieving their dreams amidst a racially divided society. The life insurance money from the death of Walter Younger Sr. becomes a focal point of collision and reveals the different aspirations and challenges each family member faces. Such collisions not only develop the characters but also shed light on the social and personal conflicts prevalent during the time.
The emotional and moral dilemmas the characters face are not isolated; they represent the universal struggle against obstacles in the pursuit of dreams and the agonizing pathos associated with confronting injustices in society. This facet of conflict in plays helps to drive the narrative, create tension, and foster audience engagement through the portrayal of relatable problems and growth within the characters.