Final answer:
If Custer had made different decisions in the Battle of Little Bighorn, the outcome may have been different. Alternative options for Custer's decisions include keeping his forces together, waiting for reinforcements, implementing a different battle strategy, and prioritizing reconnaissance and communication.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Battle of Little Bighorn, there were four key decisions made by General Custer that had a significant impact on the outcome. If Custer had made different decisions, the outcome may have been different. Here are alternative options for the four decisions Custer made:
- Decision 1: Instead of dividing his men, Custer could have kept his forces together and coordinated a unified attack.
- Decision 2: Custer could have waited for reinforcements before engaging the Lakota Sioux, ensuring a stronger overall force.
- Decision 3: Instead of ordering a fatal charge, Custer could have implemented a different battle strategy that prioritized defense and strategic maneuvering.
- Decision 4: Custer could have prioritized reconnaissance and communication to gather more accurate information about the size and location of the Lakota Sioux.