Final answer:
Based on the calculation of change in earnings minus moving costs, Crystal would have a net loss of $250, and Amelia a net gain of $200, resulting in a total net loss of $50 for the couple. This suggests that financially, they might choose not to move to Tampa, as they are at a slight loss when considering only these factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question revolves around a decision involving the comparison of total earnings and moving costs between two cities, Chicago and Tampa, for two individuals, Crystal and Amelia. To determine whether it would be financially beneficial for Crystal and Amelia to move as a couple to Tampa, we need to calculate the net benefit for each person and then combine their results. First, we calculate the change in earnings before and after the move for each person. For Crystal, the change in earnings is $550 (Tampa) - $500 (Chicago) = $50. For Amelia, the change in earnings is $1000 (Tampa) - $200 (Chicago) = $800. Then, we consider the moving costs, which are $300 for Crystal and $600 for Amelia. We subtract the moving costs from the change in earnings to find the net benefit of moving for each individual. For Crystal: $50 - $300 = -$250. For Amelia: $800 - $600 = $200. Finally, we add the net benefits of both individuals to determine the total net benefit as a couple. For Crystal and Amelia together: -$250 (Crystal's net benefit) + $200 (Amelia's net benefit) = -$50. The total net benefit of moving to Tampa as a couple is -$50. This means that the couple would have a slight financial loss if they decide to move to Tampa, assuming only these financial aspects are considered. Thus, based on the given financial information, they might be reluctant to move unless there are other factors that could positively influence their decision.