123k views
2 votes
explain how the union of concerned scientists (ucs ) relate agriculture subsidy policy to cardiovascular disease in the us? how would their cost-benefit approach to agricultural policy save $11 trillion? what are the public policy similarities between reach and the ucs approach? are these policies behavioral, biomedical and/or political economic and why

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The UCS links agriculture subsidy policies to cardiovascular disease through the support of commodity crops that are used in unhealthy processed foods. By advocating for a shift in agricultural subsidies towards healthier foods, the UCS believes it can save $11 trillion in health costs. Their approach and that of REACH involve behavioral, biomedical, and political economic elements.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) links agriculture subsidy policy to cardiovascular disease by examining how government subsidies often favor commodity crops like corn, soy, and wheat, which are primary ingredients for high-calorie, nutrient-poor processed foods. These subsidies can contribute to a market imbalance where unhealthy foods are more affordable than healthier options, potentially leading to higher rates of obesity and cardiovascular diseases. The UCS advocates for a cost-benefit approach that redirects subsidies towards the production of healthier foods like fruits and vegetables. The UCS suggests that adjusting agricultural policy could result in significant savings to public health costs. By shifting subsidies and research support toward healthier crop production, it's argued that over time this could prevent health conditions related to poor diets and save $11 trillion from averted healthcare expenses and productivity losses. The public policy approach of Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and UCS is similar in that both advocate for science-based regulations in the interest of public health and safety. Additionally, both encourage cooperative research and the application of best practices to advance public goods through policy and regulations. Analyses of these policies would conclude that they are a combination of behavioral, biomedical, and political economic. Behavioral, because they aim to influence the choices available to consumers; biomedical, as they are concerned with the health impacts of policies; and political economic, since they involve government subsidy allocation and industry regulation to address socioeconomic concerns.

User Chinmayee G
by
7.7k points