Circle II is larger and appears to be exactly twice the size of Circle I, the correct rule that represents the dilation is:
a) (x, y) -> (2x, 2y).
To determine which rule best represents the dilation applied to Circle 1 to create Circle 2, we need to compare the radii of the two circles since the dilation will affect the size of the circle while keeping its shape.
From the graph, we can visually inspect the coordinates that lie on each circle to determine their radii. By identifying points that lie on the circles and are on the axes, we can easily read off the radius of each circle.
For Circle I (the smaller circle), the radius appears to be half the length of the radius of Circle II (the larger circle), since the graph is grid-based and each square represents one unit.
The rules provided are as follows:
a) (x, y) -> (2x, 2y): This would double the size of the object, which corresponds to what appears to have happened going from Circle I to Circle II.
b) (x, y) -> (x/2, y/2): This would halve the size of the object, which is not what we observe.
c) (x, y) -> (x + 2, y + 2): This would translate the object, not dilate it.
d) (x, y) -> (x - 2, y - 2): This would also translate the object, not dilate it.
Since Circle II is larger and appears to be exactly twice the size of Circle I, the correct rule that represents the dilation is:
a) (x, y) -> (2x, 2y).
This means each coordinate point (x, y) of Circle I is multiplied by 2 to get the corresponding point on Circle II, effectively doubling the radius and creating Circle II.