Final answer:
Nuclear fission at power plants is debated, with proponents citing it as a clean, safe alternative that reduces emissions, while critics note safety risks, radioactive waste, and resource depletion.Option B is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The use of nuclear fission at power plants is often seen as a viable alternative to energy derived from fossil fuels and is a subject of ongoing debate. Proponents argue for the benefits of nuclear energy, emphasizing that it is a relatively clean and safe energy source, contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and relies on a fuel that, despite being nonrenewable, has a stable supply at the current rates of consumption.
These advantages include minimal air pollution compared to conventional fossil fuels, as nuclear plants do not release harmful air pollutants or carbon dioxide during operation. On the other hand, critics raise concerns about the significant safety risks associated with nuclear accidents, the challenge of managing radioactive waste, and the potential for uranium resources to be depleted over time.
Moreover, the risk of nuclear proliferation and the potential impact of accidental or deliberate releases of radiation are societal and environmental risks that must be considered when discussing the sustainability of nuclear electricity.