Final answer:
Carter's foreign policy differed from previous presidents during the Cold War in his emphasis on human rights. Some Americans were critical of this approach, citing strained relationships with allies and the Iran hostage crisis as evidence of failures. However, others supported Carter's focus on human rights and saw his efforts to negotiate peace in the Middle East as significant achievements.
Step-by-step explanation:
Carter's foreign policy was different and similar from other presidents during the Cold War in several ways. One of the key differences was Carter's emphasis on human rights, which he believed should be a central factor in US foreign policy. This was in contrast to previous presidents who focused more on geopolitical concerns. Carter also pursued arms control agreements, such as the SALT II treaty.
Some Americans were critical of Carter's foreign policy for various reasons. One argument was that his emphasis on human rights undermined US relationships with important allies, such as Iran. Critics argued that Carter's human rights rhetoric angered countries, making them less likely to cooperate with the US on other important issues. They also cited the Iran hostage crisis as evidence of Carter's foreign policy failures.
However, there were also those who supported Carter's foreign policy. They believed that promoting human rights was a moral imperative for the US and aligned with American values. They saw Carter's efforts to negotiate peace between Egypt and Israel as a significant achievement. Supporters argued that the criticism Carter faced was due to the complexity of the challenges he faced, rather than any inherent flaws in his approach.