Final answer:
The options could reflect different perspectives on why Mawi's parents may not have taken his side after he defended himself.
Step-by-step explanation:
Option A: It shows their neutrality and fairness. While Mawi's parents may not have taken his side, they could be trying to remain neutral and fair, possibly considering both sides of the situation.
Option B: It demonstrates their lack of understanding. This option suggests that Mawi's parents may not fully understand the situation and the need for self-defense.
Option C: It suggests they value peace over confrontation. Mawi's parents may prioritize peace and avoiding confrontations, which may explain their decision not to take his side.
Option D: It highlights their concern for Mawi's safety. Mawi's parents may understand the risks involved in defending oneself and prioritize his safety over taking his side.
Ultimately, the specific reasons behind Mawi's parents' actions can only be known if they are shared by Mawi or his parents themselves.