Final answer:
Arbitration is true to be different from other forms of alternative dispute resolution because an arbitrator makes a binding decision for the parties, distinguishing it from methods like mediation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that arbitration differs from other forms of alternative dispute resolution in that a third party hearing a dispute makes a decision for the parties is true. In arbitration, an impartial third party known as the arbitrator hears the evidence from the parties involved in the dispute and then makes a decision that is usually binding. This distinguishes arbitration from other dispute resolution methods such as mediation, where a mediator assists the parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution, but does not have the authority to make a binding decision unless both parties agree to it.
Accessible and impartial dispute resolution requires that neutral decision makers like arbitrators not only deliver justice in a timely manner but also have adequate resources and reflect the diversity of the communities they serve.