188k views
2 votes
Arbitration differs from other forms of alternative dispute resolution in that a third party hearing a dispute makes a decision for the parties.

a) True
b) False

User Seantsang
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Arbitration is true to be different from other forms of alternative dispute resolution because an arbitrator makes a binding decision for the parties, distinguishing it from methods like mediation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that arbitration differs from other forms of alternative dispute resolution in that a third party hearing a dispute makes a decision for the parties is true. In arbitration, an impartial third party known as the arbitrator hears the evidence from the parties involved in the dispute and then makes a decision that is usually binding. This distinguishes arbitration from other dispute resolution methods such as mediation, where a mediator assists the parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution, but does not have the authority to make a binding decision unless both parties agree to it.

Accessible and impartial dispute resolution requires that neutral decision makers like arbitrators not only deliver justice in a timely manner but also have adequate resources and reflect the diversity of the communities they serve.

User Dhein
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.