Question

In the 2012 case of United States v. Jones, and the 2014 case Riley v. California, the Court has _______.

1) ruled on the constitutionality of warrantless GPS tracking
2) decided on the issue of whether police can search a suspect's cellphone without a warrant
3) established the right to privacy in the digital age
4) none of the above

Answer 1

In United States v. Jones and Riley v. California, the Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of warrantless GPS tracking, decided against warrantless searches of cellphones, and helped establish the right to privacy in the digital age.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the 2012 case of United States v. Jones, and the 2014 case Riley v. California, the Court has:

1. Ruled on the constitutionality of warrantless GPS tracking
2. Decided on the issue of whether police can search a suspect's cellphone without a warrant
3. Established the right to privacy in the digital age

United States v. Jones was a significant Supreme Court case where the justices ruled that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and then using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. Similarly, Riley v. California set a precedent that police must obtain a warrant in order to search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested.

These landmark cases have helped to establish and clarify the right to privacy in the digital age, particularly concerning protections against unreasonable searches and seizures as outlined in the Fourth Amendment.