Final answer:
Doctors of Osteopathy (DO's) should not engage in punitive actions against physicians working at other hospitals, should strive to accept a range of insurances, and consider various aspects of care beyond mere competency. They also need to navigate professional challenges and ethical standards, while minimizing moral hazard in healthcare provision by aligning with efficient care models like HMOs and managed care.
Step-by-step explanation:
Doctors of Osteopathy (DO's) should avoid several practices to align with professional ethical standards and healthcare regulations. Some things DO's should not do include punishing a physician for working at other hospitals, which may infringe on employment rights and create unnecessary professional conflict. Additionally, healthcare providers should not limit their acceptance of insurance to only certain companies, as this may restrict patient access to needed care. Furthermore, focusing solely on competency without considering other vital aspects like patient communication and empathy can diminish the quality of care provided.
Healthcare professionals face challenges such as work overload, heavy physical work, patient concerns, and interpersonal problems with other medical staff. It is crucial for DO's to navigate these issues while maintaining high ethical and professional standards.
In terms of healthcare economics, one major concern is the concept of moral hazard, which can happen when patients with insurance demand more care than necessary because they do not bear the full cost of the services. This concern has been addressed by shifting from a traditional fee-for-service model to an emphasis on Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and managed care, where providers are paid a flat amount per patient with possible additional payments for specific health conditions. Providers thus have incentives to provide necessary care efficiently without overutilizing resources.