Final answer:
William Bradford viewed the world through a religious lens, emphasizing morality based on his Puritan beliefs, and used literature to document and guide spiritual pursuits. Conversely, William Shakespeare explored a wide range of human experiences, presenting a nuanced view of morality, reflecting life's complexities in his works. Their differing perspectives impacted their approach to literature, its purpose, and moral themes.
Step-by-step explanation:
William Bradford and William Shakespeare likely viewed the world and the role of literature within it quite differently, influenced by their distinct historical contexts and individual beliefs. Bradford, a Pilgrim leader and governor, approached the world with a focus on religious faith and the pursuit of a moral community. This Puritan perspective was reflected in his work, such as Of Plymouth Plantation, which chronicled the Pilgrims' journey and settlement. Bradford regarded literature as a means to document and guide spiritual and communal endeavors, upholding morality as defined by his Calvinist beliefs.
In contrast, Shakespeare, a playwright in Renaissance England, interacted with a more diverse audience and delved into the complexity of human nature through drama and poetry. His works, such as Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet, explored themes of love, power, morality, and the human condition, often with a nuanced view of right and wrong that defied simple moral categorization. He viewed literature as a mirror to society and humanity, offering both entertainment and insight into the intricacies of life and relationships.
Consequently, Bradford's view on morality was more rigid and doctrinal, while Shakespeare's was psychological and fluid, reflecting their different purposes for writing: one to instruct and record, the other to reflect and question. Furthermore, the durability and universal appeal of Shakespeare's works can be linked to his focus on timeless human experiences, which resonated across cultures and generations, suggesting that strong narratives and complex characters contribute to why literature endures.