910 views
0 votes
Which of the following arguments SUPPORTS State aid to parochial schools?

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Supporters of state aid to parochial schools argue it expands educational choices, enhances competition, and can improve educational outcomes without violating the constitution. It also aids in creating equal educational opportunities regardless of income. Examples include the Supreme Court allowing federal aid for secular teaching in religious schools and voucher programs that enable public funding for private education.

Step-by-step explanation:

Arguments Supporting State Aid to Parochial Schools

Arguments that support state aid to parochial schools highlight several potential benefits of such assistance. Proponents of state aid for parochial schools argue that such funding ensures a broader education choice for families, fostering competition which might lead to improvements in all schools, both public and private. If implemented carefully, this support could adhere to the constitutional requirement of separation between church and state by only funding the secular aspects of education. For instance, after the Agostini v. Felton case, the Supreme Court ruled that federal aid could be used to pay public school teachers to teach secular subjects in private religious schools, which demonstrates an avenue for state aid without breaching the Establishment Clause. Likewise, vouchers like those used in school choice programs demonstrate that it is feasible for public funding to enable access to private education while maintaining a secular focus, and this echoes the flexibility given to college students who can use federal aid for education at any accredited institution.

Voucher Programs and Educational Outcomes

Empirical evidence has suggested that increased school options like charter schools and school vouchers can improve educational outcomes. Moreover, this support could potentially address issues of equity, by allowing low-income families access to educational opportunities that would otherwise be beyond their reach, leading to a more diversified and inclusive education system. The fundamental argument is embedded in the value of educational diversity and the right to choose the best educational setting for one's child, whether that be a public, private, or parochial institution.

User Nisam
by
7.8k points