Final answer:
Winona LaDuke's argument for reducing light pollution is effective as it extends beyond astronomical implications to environmental and economic impacts, highlighting the need for broader public awareness and action.
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, Winona LaDuke has made an effective argument for reducing light pollution. Beyond the astronomical issues, light pollution has significant environmental impacts. It disrupts the life cycle of animals and leads to unnecessary municipal expenses and the use of fossil fuels. Organizations like the International Dark-Sky Association and citizen science projects such as Globe at Night raise awareness about these non-astronomical concerns, emphasizing the broader implications for global warming and urban ecosystems.