Final answer:
Review of new device usage in practice involves the employer, Institutional Review Board (IRB or ICC), and safety officer, all of whom assess different aspects of the device's implementation and adherence to standards.
Step-by-step explanation:
When reviewing the findings prior to making a decision about the continuing use of a new device in practice, it is not typically the responsibility of a single individual or entity. Instead, it is a collaborative process that may involve multiple parties. The options listed include an employer, an Institutional Review Board (commonly referred to as an IRB but indicated as ICC in the question), and a safety officer. While the employer has a vested interest in ensuring safe and effective tools for their organization, the IRB or ICC provides a regulatory oversight ensuring ethical compliance and participant safety in research. Safety officers, on the other hand, are pivotal in inspecting and evaluating the safety of devices and practices in the workplace.
Therefore, the decision to continue the use of a new medical device in practice would typically involve a review by all of the above: 1) the employer, to ensure the device fits the organizational needs and standards; 2) the IRB or ICC, to comply with ethical standards and regulatory requirements; and 3) the safety officer, to confirm that the device does not pose any additional risks to employees or patients and adheres to safety regulations.