Final answer:
Commissioner's official acts are subject to applicable law, constitutional principles, potential presidential veto, and Congressional approval. Supreme Court jurisdiction and specific legislation also guide their actions. Agency leadership is structured to promote unbiased and lawful decision-making.
Step-by-step explanation:
Every order, decision, license, or other official act of the Commissioner is subject to a range of potential oversight and control mechanisms. This includes the necessity for actions to comply with applicable law and be within the bounds of the Constitution, which grants the Congress the power to regulate commerce and to make laws necessary for the execution of governmental powers. Furthermore, significant decisions may also necessitate the concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives, with the possibility of a presidential veto that can only be overridden by a two-thirds majority in both houses, as outlined in the Constitution.
The oversight extends to the Supreme Court, which has the original jurisdiction in cases affecting ambassadors or where a state is a party, and can deem actions of commissioners unconstitutional. Additionally, specific executive orders and legislation, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, may impose further requirements or limitations on the actions of commissioners. Agency leadership, composed of commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, is inclusive of strict rules regarding conflicts of interest and political diversity to prevent partisan influence on official acts.