Final answer:
The statement concerning injunctions forcing employees to complete their contractual obligations is false, as injunctions cannot compel employment performance but can limit contract breaches. Moreover, the necessary and proper clause is known for expanding, not limiting, the power of the national government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, "Injunctions are commonly used by courts to force employees to complete their contractual obligations with their employers," is false. Injunctions are indeed used by courts, but they are orders that compel or prevent individuals from taking specific actions. They are not typically used to force employees to work against their will, as the court cannot compel specific performance of employment due to the 13th Amendment's prohibition of involuntary servitude. Instead, injunctions can be used to prevent employees from engaging in activities that would breach their contracts, such as working for a competitor or disclosing confidential information.
In the context of the multiple choice question referenced regarding the necessary and proper clause of the Constitution, the correct statement is that it has not had the effect of limiting the power of the national government. In fact, the necessary and proper clause has been interpreted to allow Congress to enact legislation that is deemed necessary and proper to execute its powers, thus expanding the scope of government action.
Correct statement: The necessary and proper clause has had the effect of expanding the power of the national government.