Final answer:
The statement about the federal acquisition regulation clause 52.222-50 is false; the combating trafficking in persons clause is indeed required in solicitations. Similarly, the assertion that the necessary and proper clause has limited the powers of the national government is also false; it has actually expanded its powers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Regarding the federal acquisition regulation clause 52.222-50, the statement that the combating trafficking in persons clause is not required in solicitations is false. This clause is required for inclusion in all solicitations and contracts, and it explicitly prohibits contractors and subcontractors from engaging in specific practices related to trafficking in persons, such as procuring commercial sex acts during the period of contract performance or using forced labor, and mandates a suite of other requirements and penalties for non-compliance.
Exercise 9.3.1
The statement that the necessary and proper clause has limited the power of the national government is false. In fact, the Necessary and Proper Clause, often referred to as the Elastic Clause, grants Congress the powers necessary to enact its constitutionally delegated powers and has been historically interpreted to grant Congress broad authority to carry out its functions. The clause is found in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution and has been a significant factor in the expansion of federal power.