Final answer:
It is true that it is acceptable to have employees who specialize in a single station. Specialization can lead to increased productivity and quality, and allow skilled workers to offer innovative improvements to their tasks.
Step-by-step explanation:
whether it is acceptable to have employees who can only work one station as long as they show mastery in that position is True. It is often beneficial for employees to specialize in a specific skill or task.
Specialization in the workplace allows for a higher degree of productivity and quality. Workers who focus on a single station or task tend to perform with greater efficiency and expertise. This principle applies across various jobs, from assembly line laborers to heart surgeons. Employees who are masters at their station not only work faster but also typically produce better outcomes. Moreover, they may provide valuable insights and innovative ideas to improve processes, based on their deep understanding of the task at hand.
The implications of specialization also support the argument made by Davis and Moore, which suggests that the degree of skill required for a job is proportional to its importance, with highly skilled jobs being less common and thus, having fewer individuals qualified to perform them. In essence, specializing allows for greater precision and the possibility of discovering novel ways to enhance work quality.